Notices & Announcements

No notices at this time.

The Personal Essay & Memoir

Sixteen Sessions

A free literary course for the residents of 2601 · taught by James F. Mulhern

‹ Back to all courses

What would you like to see?

Click any button below.

Important Information & Course Materials
An Invitation

Somewhere inside you there is a story that only you can tell.

Not because it is dramatic. Not because it is unusual. But because it happened to you — and because you have been carrying it long enough that you now have some distance on it, and because that distance, combined with care and attention, is exactly what turns a life into literature.

This course is an open door. Walk through it at whatever pace you need. You do not have to be a writer. You do not have to have written anything before. You only have to be willing to sit still for ninety minutes a week, read a little, listen a lot, and put pen to paper in the company of neighbors who are doing the same.


Welcome

Welcome to The Personal Essay & Memoir: Writing From a Life — a free sixteen-week course meeting right here at 2601, in the community room, for residents who want to explore the craft of true personal writing.

Over sixteen weeks we will read some of the finest essayists and memoirists working in English, talk about what makes their writing work, and then do a little writing of our own — by hand, on paper, in the room together. No screens. No keyboards. Just a pen, a blank page, and whatever you decide to bring to it.

Every session runs ninety minutes. The course is free, non-graded, and non-competitive. Nothing you write is collected or evaluated. Nothing leaves the room unless you choose to take it home.

I am glad you are here.


What This Course Is

This is a reading-and-writing workshop for adults who want to understand how the personal essay and memoir work as literary forms — and who want to try writing in those forms for themselves.

Each week we will:

  • Read a short essay or excerpt by a recognized writer in the genre
  • Discuss what the writer is doing and how they are doing it
  • Practice one craft element through a brief in-class writing exercise
  • Take home a longer prompt to work on between sessions (entirely optional)

The emphasis is on craft: on how writers select, shape, and reflect on their own experience to make something true and resonant on the page. We will talk about scene and summary, voice and persona, structure and form, memory and ethics. We will talk about the difference between what happened and what it means.


What This Course Is Not
  • It is not a confessional support group. We are here to make art from experience, not to process it.
  • It is not a competitive workshop. No one’s writing will be criticized, ranked, or compared.
  • It is not a lecture. I will talk, but so will you. The best learning in this room will come from conversation.
  • It is not a commitment to publish. Whatever you write belongs entirely to you.
  • It is not required. Come when you can. Read what you are able. Write what feels right.
  • It is not graded. There is no right answer to any of the discussion questions.

About the Instructor

James F. Mulhern is a Professor of English and a former Department Chair, and is the recipient of a fully funded Writing Fellowship at Exeter College, University of Oxford. He is a published memoirist whose work explores family, memory, and the experience of growing up in working-class America. He has taught writing at the university level for many years and believes, without reservation, that every adult has at least one memoir inside them worth reading.

He lives in Philadelphia.


Course Details
Course Title The Personal Essay & Memoir: Writing From a Life
Instructor James F. Mulhern
Location Community Room, 2601
Day & Time Weekly, 90 minutes
Duration Sixteen weeks
Cost Free
Class Size Open to all 2601 residents
Materials Pen and paper (provided if needed)
Grading None

What to Expect Each Week

Before you arrive: Each session has a short reading assignment — usually five to twenty pages, sometimes less. Reading ahead makes the discussion richer, but if life gets in the way, come anyway. We will spend time in class with the text.

In the room: We open with a few minutes for settling in and brief check-ins. Then we move to the reading and craft discussion — roughly forty-five to fifty minutes. Then we write: a focused in-class exercise, ten to fifteen minutes, by hand on paper. No one is asked to share unless they want to. The session closes with any questions or observations about the take-home prompt.

After class: An optional take-home prompt is offered each week. These are invitations, not assignments. If you write something and want to bring it back to read aloud — in whole or in part — Session 16 is your moment.


A Few Promises to You
  • I will not embarrass you, call on you, or put you on the spot.
  • I will not ask you to share anything you have written unless you choose to share it.
  • I will respond to all writing — if you choose to show it to me — with honesty and warmth, in that order.
  • I will start on time and end on time.
  • I will treat every person in this room as a writer.

A Few Asks of You
  • Come when you can, even if you haven’t done the reading.
  • When others are speaking, listen the way you want to be listened to.
  • Bring a pen. The writing in this course is done by hand.
  • Be patient with yourself. First drafts — especially the handwritten, timed ones we do in class — are not supposed to be finished.
  • Come to Session 16. We will celebrate what we have made.

Schedule at a Glance
Session Focus
1 Welcome & the Essay vs. Memoir — what each is, what each isn’t
2 Reading Montaigne & Dillard — the essay as thinking on the page
3 Scene vs. Summary I — slowing down
4 Scene vs. Summary II — practice and application
5 The Reflective “I” — the voice that looks back
6 Persona — the self you construct on the page
7 Place as Character — where we come from, where we are
8 Time & Memory — how we remember, why it matters
9 Family & Inheritance I — writing the people who made us
10 Family & Inheritance II — inherited stories and silences
11 The Difficult Subject — writing about others with honesty and care
12 The Body & the Senses — the physical life of memoir
13 Structure I — chronological and lyric
14 Structure II — braided and fragmented
15 Revision Workshop — re-seeing your own work
16 Reading & Celebration — a voluntary read-aloud of student work

Glossary

Persona The version of yourself that appears on the page. The narrator of a memoir is not identical to the author; they are a constructed presence, shaped by the choices of selection, emphasis, and tone. A memoirist builds a persona the way a novelist builds a character — with intention.

The Reflective “I” The narrating voice in memoir and personal essay that looks back on experience with understanding unavailable to the person who lived it. The reflective “I” is the seat of meaning in memoir — not simply the one who acts, but the one who now comprehends. Phillip Lopate calls this “the reflecting consciousness.”

Scene A moment of narrative rendered in real time: dialogue, sensory detail, action unfolding. Scene puts the reader inside an experience. It slows the clock. It is the primary mode of dramatic intensity in memoir.

Summary Narrative that covers time efficiently, giving context, background, or pattern without dramatizing a specific moment. Summary is necessary — without it, a memoir would never move — but overused, it keeps readers at arm’s length from the experience.

In Medias Res Latin: “into the middle of things.” A structural technique in which a narrative begins not at the chronological beginning but at a moment of tension or action already in progress. Many successful memoirs and personal essays begin in medias res and fill in the backstory later.

Braided Essay A form of creative nonfiction in which two or more separate narrative threads are woven together throughout a single essay. The threads may appear to have nothing in common; the revelation of the essay often comes in the hidden connection between them. Jo Ann Beard’s “The Fourth State of Matter” is a classic example.

Lyric Essay An essay that moves by image, association, and resonance rather than by linear argument or chronological plot. The lyric essay borrows structural strategies from poetry. It values compression, ambiguity, and the suggestive gap. It does not always resolve, and the irresolution is often the point.

Second-Person POV The narrative voice that addresses the reader (or the author’s past self) as “you.” Second person is relatively rare in memoir but can be a powerful way to create immediacy, to implicate the reader, or to achieve a kind of protective distance from painful material.

Voice The sum of all the choices a writer makes that create a distinct personality on the page: syntax, diction, rhythm, tone, what is said and what is withheld. Voice is not style alone — it is the felt presence of a consciousness. The reader should feel that this could only have been written by this person.

Candor In memoir, candor is not the same as confession. It is the willingness to tell the truth — including uncomfortable truths about oneself — without flinching and without performing. The best memoirists are candid not for shock but for accuracy: this is what it was actually like. Candor earns the reader’s trust in a way that evasion never can.


Reading Companion Essay

Writing Toward Truth, Not Just Fact

There is a distinction that matters enormously in memoir, and it is easy to miss: the distinction between fact and truth.

A fact is a verifiable datum. The house was on Clearfield Street. The year was 1987. My mother said those words. These are facts, or at least they are my best recollection of facts, and they provide the scaffolding of any memoir. Without them, we are writing fiction.

But truth — the kind of truth that memoir is after — is something larger and harder to pin down. Truth is what the fact meant. Truth is the feeling that lived inside the year 1987, inside that house, underneath those words my mother said. Truth is what persists after the facts have been forgotten or distorted or reshuffled by time.

Every serious writer of memoir will tell you that memory is unreliable. We know this. Neuroscience confirms what anyone over fifty already suspects: memory is not a recording; it is a reconstruction. Each time we remember something, we alter it slightly. We add the feeling we have about it now. We shade it with what we have learned since.

This does not make memoir dishonest. It makes it human.

What it requires — what separates the serious memoirist from the casual one — is the acknowledgment that the narrator’s perspective is a perspective, not the perspective. This is why the best memoirists build into their work what we might call an epistemological humility: phrases like I believe, or It seemed to me, or I could not have known then, or simply the silence of not claiming to understand what they cannot have understood. Mary Karr puts it directly in The Art of Memoir: she never speaks with authority about how people feel or what their motives were. She keeps the focus on her own interior. She lets the reader know when she is speculating.

Vivian Gornick offers another way into this question. In The Situation and the Story, she distinguishes between the situation — the external circumstances, the plot of what happened — and the story — the emotional insight the writer is pursuing, the thing the writer has come to understand. The situation is the vehicle. The story is the destination. And here is the hard truth: you cannot know what the story is when you begin. You discover it in the writing.

This is why the first draft of a memoir is always, on some level, an act of exploration. You sit down thinking you are writing about the time your father got sick. You discover you are writing about authority. You think you are writing about a summer job. You find you are writing about shame. The facts take you somewhere you did not plan to go. That somewhere, if you follow it honestly, is where the truth lives.

For this reason, good memoir writing is not a matter of remembering correctly. It is a matter of attending carefully — to the detail that insists on being included, to the feeling that keeps returning even when you try to write past it, to the image that appears at the beginning and again at the end without your having planned it.

The craft of personal writing is, at bottom, the craft of paying attention. Not only to the world outside — though place and season and the texture of rooms are never incidental — but to the interior weather that runs beneath the surface of our days. The memoirist’s job is to triangulate between these two: the outer world and the inner one, the fact and the truth, what happened and what it meant.

The body is part of this. Memory is stored in the body before it is stored in the mind — in the smell of a particular house, the weight of a particular coat, the feeling of a particular floor under bare feet. Writers who work only from the neck up miss half the archive. Let your senses be your first drafts.

Structure is part of this too. The shape you give your material is not neutral. A chronological structure says: these events led, inevitably, to this. A braided structure says: these two things belong together even though I cannot explain why. A lyric structure says: this experience does not resolve, and I will not pretend that it does. Choose your structure the way you choose your words — with intention, because it is the truest form for this particular truth.

And finally: revision. The first draft is the act of remembering. The second draft is the act of understanding. By the third draft, if you have been honest with yourself about what the piece is really about, you will know what to cut: everything that does not serve the truth you have discovered. The cut is not a loss. It is the final act of precision.

When you write in this course, you do not have to have it figured out before you begin. In fact, if you have it entirely figured out before you begin, you may be writing a report rather than an essay. Come to the page with a question, a pressure, an image that will not leave you alone. Follow it. The truth, if it is there, will meet you somewhere in the middle of the page.

You do not have to write for publication. You do not have to write for anyone but yourself. But if you write with sufficient honesty and attention — if you stay with the difficulty rather than skating past it — you will almost certainly write something worth keeping. Something that, in ten or twenty years, will let you say: That is what it was like. I was there. I paid attention. I told the truth as well as I could.

That is not nothing. In fact, it is nearly everything.


About Me

I am a Professor of English and a former Department Chair, and I am the recipient of a fully funded Writing Fellowship at Exeter College, University of Oxford. I have been teaching writing at the university level for most of my adult life, and before that I was a student of writers who taught me that the best thing a teacher can do is get out of the way and let the work happen.

I am a published memoirist. My own writing is concerned with memory, family, working-class experience, and the ordinary tragedies and joys that make up most of a life. I believe memoir is one of the most democratic of literary forms — it requires no specialized knowledge, no particular credential, no extraordinary life. It requires only the willingness to look honestly at what you have lived and to try, with care and patience, to put it into words.

I live in Philadelphia. I am glad to be teaching here, in this building, for these neighbors.

If you have questions, or if you want to talk about a piece of writing you are already working on, please email me at [email protected].


This course is offered free of charge to residents of 2601, Philadelphia. All materials are for educational use within the course community.

The Sessions
‹ Close

Session 1 — Welcome & the Essay vs. Memoir: What Each Is, What Each Isn't

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. The personal essay follows a mind in motion. It is associative and ranging, circling an idea rather than marching through a plot. The word essay comes from the French essai — an attempt, a try — and the essayist is pursuing conclusions rather than reporting them. The form rewards curiosity over certainty.
  2. The memoir traces a sustained arc of experience. Where the essay circles, the memoir moves: it carries characters, scenes, and the felt passage of time toward an emotional understanding. It is narrative in shape even when it is meditative in spirit.
  3. Both forms are rooted in the first person and in lived experience. They are close cousins, each concerned with what it means to be a thinking, feeling human being in a specific time and place. Learning one strengthens the other.
  4. Double consciousness is where the literature lives. Every piece holds two selves at once — the self who lived the experience and the self who now, from some distance, makes sense of it. That gap between acting and understanding is the engine of meaning.
  5. The notebook is the laboratory of the form. As Didion shows, the writer records not facts but how things felt — the raw, private material from which essays and memoirs are later fashioned. Keeping one teaches you to notice before you interpret.

Reading

Critical Reception

  • The Art of Fiction No. 71: Joan DidionThe Paris Review interview — Didion on grammar, notebooks, and the act of writing to find out what she thinks.
  • To Fashion a Text (bibliographic record and commentary) — The Annie Dillard Log — situates Dillard’s craft essay within her larger body of work and the Zinsser anthology.
  • Inventing the Truth: The Art and Craft of Memoirreader commentary at Goodreads — a helpful gloss on Dillard’s claim that the writing “replaces” the memory it draws from.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write the opening of a notebook entry — not as a polished piece, but as Didion describes: a private record of how something felt. Begin with a specific, concrete detail: a smell, a sound, an object. Do not explain what it means. Just render it.

Discussion Questions

  1. Didion says her notebook is not a record of facts but of how things felt to her at a given moment. How is that different from a diary? From a memoir?
  2. Dillard describes memoir as an object you make, not simply a story you remember. What is the difference?
  3. What would you say is the difference between a personal essay and a short memoir? Where does the line fall?
  4. Have you kept a journal, notebook, or diary at any point in your life? What went in it — and what did you leave out?
  5. What draws you personally to this course? Is there a story, an experience, or a period of your life you are already thinking about?
  6. Didion says she keeps a notebook to stay “on nodding terms” with her former selves. Which former self of yours would you most like to be on nodding terms with again?

Homework

Write one paragraph that answers the question: Why am I here? Not philosophically — literally. What draws you to the idea of writing from your own life? What story, if any, are you already carrying?


‹ Close

Session 2 — Reading Montaigne & Dillard: The Essay as Thinking on the Page

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Montaigne invented the essay as an act of self-examination. Writing in his tower in the 1570s and 1580s, he discovered that thinking honestly about the self illuminates the world: “Every man carries the form of the human condition within him.” This remains the justification for all personal writing.
  2. The essay is a record of thinking, not a delivery of conclusions. Montaigne’s motto — que sçay-je?, “What do I know?” — keeps the form humble and exploratory. We watch the mind arrive at ideas rather than receive them pre-packaged.
  3. Dillard treats the examined life, rendered with precision, as literature. She works the sentence at the level of phrase and image, proving that close attention to language is itself a form of moral seriousness.
  4. Strong personal writing earns its leaps. In “Living Like Weasels,” Dillard moves from a nature observation to a meditation on purpose and will; the leap works because the image of the weasel is rendered so concretely that the abstraction feels inevitable.
  5. Inquiry is more generative than argument. Beginning from a genuine question — something you do not yet know the answer to — produces livelier prose than beginning from a thesis you intend to prove.

Reading

  • Michel de Montaigne, “Of Experience” or “To Philosophize Is to Learn to Die” (excerpt) — public domain; available via Project Gutenberg and many online sources
  • Annie Dillard, “Living Like Weasels” (from Teaching a Stone to Talk, 1982) — full text freely available at DailyGood

Critical Reception

  • Michel de MontaigneInternet Encyclopedia of Philosophy — a scholarly overview of Montaigne’s skepticism and his informal, conversational style that founded the essay.
  • Phillip Lopate Celebrates the Personal EssayColumbia Magazine — traces the lineage from Montaigne and Seneca to modern essayists including Dillard.
  • Bibliography of Annie Dillard’s essaysThe Annie Dillard Log — locates “Living Like Weasels” within Teaching a Stone to Talk and her wider work.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Begin with a question — not a rhetorical one, but something you actually do not know the answer to. Write for ten minutes following the question wherever it leads. Do not try to resolve it. Stay with the not-knowing.

Discussion Questions

  1. Montaigne says the wisest thing he knows is “que sçay-je?” — “What do I know?” How does that spirit of inquiry shape his essay? Do you find it humbling, or liberating, or both?
  2. Dillard’s “Living Like Weasels” moves from a nature observation to a meditation on purpose and will. How does she make that leap? Does it work?
  3. Both Montaigne and Dillard write about their own minds thinking — we watch them arrive at ideas. How is this different from writing that simply presents conclusions?
  4. Notice a single sentence in either reading that you find remarkable. Why does it work? What is the writer doing with the language?
  5. What question are you carrying that you might explore in a personal essay?

Homework

Choose one memory — a single moment or period — and write one page in which you not only describe what happened but also wonder about it. Ask a question of the memory. Let the question stand unanswered.


‹ Close

Session 3 — Scene vs. Summary I: Slowing Down

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Every personal narrative moves between two modes: scene and summary. Scene slows time down and puts us in the room; summary speeds time up and covers distance. Mastering memoir begins with feeling the difference between them.
  2. Scene is a miniature theater. It renders dialogue, weather, light, and gesture so that the reader is there — given the materials to feel rather than told what to feel. It is the primary engine of dramatic intensity.
  3. Scene depends on what you actually remember. Not what you know happened, but what you can see when you close your eyes: the concrete, sensory residue that has survived in memory is the most trustworthy material for a scene.
  4. Juxtaposition can carry meaning that statement cannot. Baldwin opens with two deaths occurring at once — the public and the personal placed side by side — so the arrangement itself says what neither event could say alone.
  5. The single charged detail outperforms the explanation. White’s lake essay shows that one precisely rendered image will deliver emotional meaning more powerfully than any summary of what the moment “meant.”

Reading

Critical Reception

  • Notes of a Native Son: Summary & AnalysisLitCharts — close reading of how Baldwin braids his father’s death with the Harlem riots and the public-personal juxtaposition.
  • Notes of a Native Son (analysis) — GradeSaver study guide — on how Baldwin uses coincident dates to fuse private and historical time.
  • Notes of a Native SonWikipedia overview — context on the essay collection and Baldwin’s critique of “protest” literature.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Choose a single memory — something you could describe in a paragraph. Now slow it all the way down. Write only the scene: one room, one moment, maximum sensory detail. Do not explain what it means. Do not summarize. Just be there.

Discussion Questions

  1. Find one passage in White’s essay that is unmistakably scene — you are there with him at the lake. What makes it work? What specific details carry it?
  2. Baldwin opens with two deaths occurring simultaneously. How does the juxtaposition of the public and the personal work? What does placing them side by side say that saying them separately could not?
  3. White’s essay is also full of summary — stretches where he covers years in a sentence. Find one of those passages. What does summary buy him there that scene could not?
  4. When you think about a memory you would like to write about, which details come first — the visual, the auditory, the physical? What does that tell you about how you remember?
  5. White’s famous last line delivers the essay’s full emotional meaning in a single sentence. Did it land for you? Why or why not?

Homework

Write one page that is entirely scene — a moment you remember with unusual clarity. Begin in medias res, in the middle of the action. Do not explain the backstory. Trust the details to carry the meaning.


‹ Close

Session 4 — Scene vs. Summary II: Practice and Application

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. The choice between scene and summary is never arbitrary. It reflects what the writer wants the reader to experience at a given moment — to dwell inside an event or to be carried swiftly across time. Mode is a decision about attention.
  2. Summary is compression with purpose. Good summary is not a list of events but the felt sensation of years passing; it moves a narrative across time without losing the reader or draining the emotion.
  3. Transitions hide the seams. Skilled writers move from scene to summary and back without jolting the reader. Watch how Doyle, in particular, can fold years into a single sentence and then drop back into a vivid, present image.
  4. Rhythm and syntax are tools of pacing. Doyle is celebrated for the music of his sentences; reading him aloud reveals how cadence itself signals when time is speeding up or slowing down.
  5. Both modes carry risk. Too much scene and a piece stalls; too much summary and the reader is held at arm’s length. The art is in the alternation — knowing when to linger and when to leap.

Reading

Critical Reception

  • Eight Variations on the Idea of a SentenceBrevity Magazine craft essay — a craft tribute to Doyle’s syntax and his way of compressing time within a single breathless sentence.
  • On Brian Doyle’s Mystical, Genre-Exploding WorkLiterary Hub — an appreciation of how Doyle blurs scene, summary, and prayer.
  • Brian Doyle on attention as prayerRewrite Radio interview transcript — Doyle in his own words on the discipline of paying attention.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write a passage of pure summary: cover at least three years of your life in no more than half a page. Make it feel like time moving — not a list of events, but the sensation of years passing. Then add a single sentence of scene at the end, an image that anchors all of it.

Discussion Questions

  1. Doyle’s essays are often very short but cover enormous amounts of time. How does he do it? Find one moment where he compresses years into a sentence or two — what does the compression feel like?
  2. Doyle is frequently praised for his rhythm and syntax. Read one paragraph of his aloud (silently, to yourself). What do you notice about how the sentences move?
  3. In your own take-home writing from last week: was there a moment where you found yourself wanting to move faster? That pull toward speed is your instinct toward summary. What were you trying to skip past, and why?
  4. What is the risk of too much scene? What is the risk of too much summary?
  5. Think of a period of your life — several years, not a single moment. How would you summarize it in two or three sentences? What would you have to leave out?

Homework

Take the scene you wrote last week. Now write the page that comes before it: the summary that brings the reader to the door of that scene. How little can you say and still have the scene make sense?


‹ Close

Session 5 — The Reflective "I": The Voice That Looks Back

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Memoir is defined by a reflecting consciousness. Phillip Lopate’s phrase names the narrator who is not only living the experience but thinking about it — the voice that says, I did not know then what I know now.
  2. Two selves work at once. The experiencing self and the narrating self together give memoir its particular intelligence and tenderness; the distance between them is what allows insight without sentimentality.
  3. Reflection is not explanation. A writer who stops the action to announce what everything means is lecturing, not reflecting. The best reflection is woven into the story — felt in a tone, a word choice, a pause — rather than stated outright.
  4. The interesting narrator is self-aware, not necessarily likable. Lopate argues the essayist must be willing to be “a problem to themselves,” exposing contradiction and doubt rather than performing virtue.
  5. Humor can be a mode of reflection. As Sedaris demonstrates, comedy lets a writer say difficult or self-revealing things at a slant, disarming the reader and the self at the same time.

Reading

Critical Reception

  • The Art of the Personal Essay (introduction excerpt) — ReadingGroupGuides — Lopate on intimacy and the essayist “speaking directly into your ear.”
  • Phillip Lopate Celebrates the Personal EssayColumbia Magazine — profile of the anthologist who codified the reflective “I.”
  • David Sedaris: humor and self-revelationFresh Air / NPR interview — Sedaris on craft, persona, and using comedy to tell the truth.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write about something you did — a decision, a moment, a choice — that you now see differently. Use both voices: the voice of then and the voice of now. They can alternate, or the present voice can enter like a soft comment on what the past self did not yet understand.

Discussion Questions

  1. Lopate argues that the personal essay requires a narrator who is “interesting” — not necessarily likable, but self-aware. What makes a narrator on the page interesting to you as a reader?
  2. Sedaris uses humor as a mode of reflection. What does the humor in “Jesus Shaves” allow him to say that a straightforward narrative could not?
  3. Think of a piece of writing you love — a book, a film, a story. Is the narrator self-aware? How do you know?
  4. Lopate says the essayist must be willing to be “a problem to themselves.” What does that mean? Have you ever been a problem to yourself?
  5. Is there a difference between honesty and self-exposure? Where is the line?

Homework

Write one page in which you describe a past version of yourself. Be specific: how old were you, where were you, what did you believe that you no longer believe? Let the present-tense you be gently, honestly visible.


‹ Close

Session 6 — Persona: The Self You Construct on the Page

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. The “I” on the page is not you. It is a persona — a version of yourself constructed through choices about which details to include, what tone to take, and what to claim or admit you don’t know. Recognizing this is the first step toward writing with intention.
  2. Persona is built the way a novelist builds a character. This does not mean fabricating; it means understanding that writing is always also selecting, and that selection is an art with consequences for how the reader sees you.
  3. The narrator can serve a purpose larger than the self. As Gornick puts it, she became interested in her own existence “only as a means of penetrating the situation at hand.” The persona is a lens, not a destination.
  4. Voice can be wielded as deliberate action. Lorde’s insistence that “it is not difference which immobilizes us, but silence” shows a first-person persona built to do specific public work — to transform silence into language.
  5. A memoirist can be an unreliable narrator. Admitting the limits and biases of the constructed self — even allowing the reader to see past it — can deepen trust rather than break it.

Reading

Critical Reception

  • How to Own Your Story: Vivian Gornick on the Art of Personal NarrativeThe Marginalian — Maria Popova’s reading of Gornick’s distinction between the narrator and the writer.
  • The Transformation of Silence into Language and ActionDePaul University VIA blog — a course-context discussion of Lorde’s essay-speech and its rhetorical stance.
  • Sister Outsider study guide on Lorde’s essay — GradeSaver — summary and analysis of the persona Lorde constructs to do public work.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Introduce yourself — but do it in third person, as if you are a novelist introducing a character. What would a narrator say about you? What would they notice first? What contradiction would they point to?

Discussion Questions

  1. Lorde writes: “It is not difference which immobilizes us, but silence.” How does she use the first-person voice as an act of deliberate self-construction — a persona built to do specific work?
  2. Gornick distinguishes between the writer and the narrator: “I became interested in my own existence only as a means of penetrating the situation at hand.” What does that mean? Have you ever used your own story to get at something larger?
  3. Think about the version of yourself you present in day-to-day life. How is that different from the version you might put on the page? What would you allow on the page that you wouldn’t allow in a conversation?
  4. Can a memoirist be an unreliable narrator? What would that look like?
  5. What aspects of yourself do you find hardest to write about honestly?

Homework

Write one page of memoir in which you are clearly the narrator — the reflective, present “I” — but also the subject. Let the narrator be slightly harder on the subject than you usually are on yourself. Let the narrator love the subject, too.


‹ Close

Session 7 — Place as Character: Where We Come From, Where We Are

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Place is not backdrop. In the best memoir and personal essays, place is alive — it has a personality, a pressure, a set of demands. The neighborhood, the house, the kitchen’s particular smell are arguments about what kind of life was possible.
  2. The geography outside is always also geography inside. Writers who handle place well know the physical world and the interior life are not separate; rendering a room can reveal a self more accurately than any direct statement of feeling.
  3. Specific places resist generic description. The aim is detail precise enough that a reader who has never been there can feel its weight. Naming the actual street, the actual season, the actual object grounds the emotion.
  4. Place can be made to want something. Oliver’s “Of Power and Time” treats the inhabited world as a force shaping the writer’s creative life; imagining a place as a character with desires clarifies what it asked of you.
  5. Memory of a place and the place itself diverge. The gap between how we remember a place and how it actually is becomes its own subject — a record of how time and longing reshape what we carry.

Reading

  • Mary Oliver, “Of Power and Time” (from Upstream: Selected Essays, 2016) — key passage freely available at The Marginalian
  • A Philadelphia-set essay from Brevity Magazine — search the Brevity archive by topic for essays on city life, neighborhood, urban experience; the Brevity essay index by topic is a rich and freely browsable resource

Critical Reception

  • The Third Self: Mary Oliver on Creativity and TimeThe Marginalian — a reading of how Oliver’s rooted, physical world shapes her argument about creative work.
  • Upstream (excerpt) — Penguin Random House Canada — Oliver’s own prose on attention to the natural and inhabited world.
  • Brevity essays by mode and topicBrevity Magazine index — a freely browsable archive of short nonfiction, useful for finding city- and place-driven essays.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Describe a place that made you. Do not explain what it means; let the details carry the meaning. Use at least three of the five senses. Write in the present tense, as if you are standing there now.

Discussion Questions

  1. Oliver’s essay is ostensibly about time and creative work, but it is deeply rooted in the physical world she inhabits. How does place shape her argument? Would the essay be the same if she lived somewhere else?
  2. Think about the place where you spent the most formative years of your life. If that place were a character in a story — if it could want something from you — what would it want?
  3. What does Philadelphia ask of the people who live here? What does it give? What does it take?
  4. We often describe places as they were, not as they are. Does your memory of a place ever conflict with the reality you would find if you returned? What does that gap tell you?
  5. Is there a room — not a landscape, just a room — that you carry with you? What is in it?

Homework

Write one page about a place — a room, a street, a city block, a landscape — that you carry inside you. Let the place be specific enough that a reader who has never been there can feel its weight.


‹ Close

Session 8 — Time & Memory: How We Remember, Why It Matters

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Memory is reconstruction, not recording. Each time we remember, we rebuild — adding present feelings, later understanding, and the story we have told ourselves over years. This is not a flaw of memoir; it is its condition.
  2. Memoir owes more to emotional truth than to factual accuracy. What the fact meant is the destination; the verifiable datum is only the scaffolding. The serious memoirist pursues the truth that persists after the facts blur.
  3. Uncertainty belongs on the page. Honest phrasing — “I believe,” “it seemed to me,” “I could not have known then” — signals epistemological humility and, paradoxically, earns the reader’s trust.
  4. The story is emotional insight, not plot. Following Gornick, the memoirist’s job is not to report what happened but to discover what it means; that discovery usually arrives only in the act of writing.
  5. Time itself can be a subject. Memory is a quarry the writer keeps returning to, finding more in it each time; the past one circles obsessively often holds the meaning not yet understood.

Reading

Critical Reception

  • On Brian Doyle’s Mystical, Genre-Exploding WorkLiterary Hub — on Doyle’s treatment of memory as an inexhaustible, returnable resource.
  • How to Own Your Story: Vivian GornickThe Marginalian — frames the difference between what happened and what it means.
  • Eight Variations on the Idea of a SentenceBrevity Magazine craft essay — a close look at how Doyle’s sentences hold time and memory in suspension.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write about a memory that you are not sure is accurate. Write it anyway, but let the uncertainty be visible — use “I think,” “I believe,” “it seems to me now.” Notice how that language changes the tone of the piece.

Discussion Questions

  1. Doyle’s title, “The Inexhaustible Quarry of Memory,” suggests memory is a resource you keep digging in. Do you experience memory that way — as something you can return to and find more in?
  2. Gornick argues that the memoirist’s job is not to report what happened but to discover what it means. Do you agree? Is there a difference between “what happened” and “what it means”?
  3. Have you ever found that your memory of an event disagreed with another person who was there? What do you do with that disagreement as a writer?
  4. What is the difference between truth and accuracy in memoir? Can something be emotionally true without being factually precise?
  5. Is there a period of your past that you find yourself returning to again and again — that seems to have more in it than you have yet fully understood?

Homework

Write one page in which two versions of the same event appear: what you remember, and what someone else might remember. Let both versions be true. Do not declare a winner.


‹ Close

Session 9 — Family & Inheritance I: Writing the People Who Made Us

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Family is memoir’s deepest and most dangerous subject. We are shaped by our families in ways we are still discovering and limited by them in ways we may be reluctant to name. Writing about them demands honesty and love at once.
  2. Entering family material requires a way in. The craft challenge is choosing which person or moment to begin with, and resisting the pull toward either pure devotion or pure grievance. The best family writing holds complexity.
  3. Inherited memory can be its own subject. As Kingston shows, a writer can work with a story she was told rather than one she witnessed — making the gap between inherited memory and personal experience part of the meaning.
  4. Character is revealed through body and gesture, not adjectives. Saying “she was kind” tells; rendering what a person’s hands did, how they entered a room, shows. Physical detail carries family portraiture further than judgment.
  5. Repetition reveals how a family worked. A ritual or recurring scene — the thing that happened again and again — often exposes more about the family’s machinery than any single dramatic event.

Reading

  • Maxine Hong Kingston, “No Name Woman” (opening of The Woman Warrior: Memoirs of a Girlhood Among Ghosts, 1976) — free borrow via Internet Archive; one of the most widely taught pieces of American memoir
  • Brian Doyle, “The Hills and Dales of Their Father” — freely available at The American Scholar

Critical Reception

  • No Name Woman: Summary and AnalysisCliffsNotes — a close reading of how Kingston handles an inherited, forbidden family story.
  • The Woman Warrior: A Question of GenreBoston University Writing Program journal — a student-scholar essay on the book’s blend of fact and fictionalization.
  • Crisis of Genre and Diasporic Identity in Maxine Hong KingstonIJFMR research paper (PDF) — a scholarly treatment of the memoir’s structure and inherited memory.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write about one person in your family using only physical details and actions. No adjectives of character (“she was kind,” “he was difficult”). Let the body and the gesture carry the meaning.

Discussion Questions

  1. Kingston opens with a story she was told — a family secret — not one she witnessed. How does she handle the gap between inherited memory and personal experience? Does that gap become part of the subject?
  2. Doyle’s essay about his children is short and light-toned, but it carries enormous weight by the end. How does he earn the emotion without announcing it?
  3. Think about one family member — living or dead — who shaped you significantly. What would be the first thing you would want a reader to know about them?
  4. Is there a family story that has been told so many times it has become a kind of mythology? What is it really about?
  5. What are the risks of writing about your family while they are still alive? What are the risks of waiting until they are gone?

Homework

Write one page about a family ritual, tradition, or recurring scene — something that happened again and again. Let the repetition itself reveal something about how your family worked.


‹ Close

Session 10 — Family & Inheritance II: Inherited Stories and Silences

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Silences instruct as powerfully as stories. Every family has narratives that are told and subjects that are never named. What was spoken around but not said directly often carries the deepest charge for a memoirist.
  2. Inherited memory shapes us without our consent. The experiences of earlier generations — a migration, a tragedy, a secret — live in us even when we were not present for them. Writing can make that invisible inheritance visible.
  3. Breaking a family silence carries cost and craft. As Kingston dramatizes when her mother says, “You must not tell anyone,” the memoirist who breaks such a silence takes on ethical weight as well as artistic risk.
  4. The unsaid can be written obliquely. A writer need not expose the secret directly; writing around it, letting the silence shape the prose, can be both more honest and more powerful than disclosure.
  5. A family’s way of talking — or not — is itself characterization. How relatives discuss or avoid the past tells the reader who they were, what they protected, and what they damaged.

Reading

  • Maxine Hong Kingston, continued or a second excerpt from The Woman Warriorfree borrow via Internet Archive
  • An essay from Brevity Magazine on family, inheritance, or intergenerational memory — search the Brevity topic index; the Brevity archive is freely searchable and contains hundreds of short essays on exactly these subjects

Critical Reception

  • The Woman Warrior: A Question of GenreBoston University Writing Program journal — on Kingston’s handling of stories told “under condition of silence.”
  • No Name Woman analysis — CliffsNotes — examines the ethics and craft of breaking an inherited silence.
  • Brevity essays by mode and topicBrevity Magazine index — a freely searchable archive of short essays on family, inheritance, and intergenerational memory.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write about something you know about your family that you were not supposed to know. You do not have to reveal what it is — you can be oblique, impressionistic. Write around it. Let the silence shape the prose.

Discussion Questions

  1. Kingston writes about stories passed down through generations — stories she was told under condition of silence (“You must not tell anyone,” her mother said). What does it mean for a memoirist to break that kind of silence? What does it cost?
  2. Is there a story in your family that was passed down — a grandparent’s experience, a tragedy, a migration — that you carry but did not live? How does that inherited story affect you?
  3. What do family silences teach? What do they protect? What do they damage?
  4. If you could ask one question of a deceased family member, what would it be? Why hasn’t that question been answered?
  5. What does your family’s way of talking — or not talking — about the past tell you about who they were?

Homework

Write one page that begins: “What I was never told was —” Let the essay follow that thread wherever it goes.


‹ Close

Session 11 — The Difficult Subject: Writing About Others With Honesty and Care

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Every memoirist eventually asks: do I have the right to write this? When our stories involve others who may be living, who did not consent, or who remember differently, we enter complicated ethical territory that craft alone cannot resolve.
  2. The goal is understanding, not revenge. The difference between a portrait and a hit job lies in the quality of attention. We write to comprehend another person, not to settle a score.
  3. Karr’s practical ethics give a working code. Never speak with authority about others’ feelings or motives; keep the focus on your own interior; let subjects choose pseudonyms; be willing to cut what someone flatly denies. These rules protect the work as much as the people.
  4. Fairness is honest inquiry, not equal time. Balance is a journalistic value; memoir owes the reader candor and the subject genuine attention, not a tallied scorecard of pros and cons.
  5. Staying in your own interior protects others. As Gornick suggests, when the narrator remains the primary subject — penetrating the situation through the self — the other people in the story are treated as humans rather than reduced to characters.

Reading

  • Mary Karr, excerpt from The Art of Memoir (2015) — specifically her chapter on writing about family members and her practical ethics for memoirists; free borrow via Internet Archive; key principles also available at Bookmarker
  • Vivian Gornick, excerpt from The Situation and the Story — her discussion of the narrator’s relationship to the people in the memoir; free borrow via Internet Archive

Critical Reception

  • Mary Karr, The Art of Memoir No. 1The Paris Review interview — Karr on truth, memory’s blanks, and not treating readers as enemies.
  • Mary Karr on Reading and The Art of MemoirBroad Street — an editor’s framing of Karr’s ethics for writing about family.
  • Sass + Big Heart = Mary KarrLighthouse Writers Workshop — on Karr’s stance toward memory’s gaps and the writer’s obligation to the reader.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write about someone who hurt you. Do not tell us what they did wrong. Give us one scene in which their complexity is visible — a moment when you saw something in them that surprised you, or something that made them human even as they were failing you.

Discussion Questions

  1. Karr offers a specific set of ethics: never speak with authority about how people feel or what their motives were; keep the focus on your own interior; let subjects choose pseudonyms; be willing to cut material someone flatly denies. Which of these feels most important to you? Which feels hardest?
  2. Karr also says: “If you’re writing about somebody you hate, do it with great love.” What does that mean? Is it possible?
  3. Gornick says she became interested in her own existence “only as a means of penetrating the situation at hand.” If the memoirist stays focused on their own experience, does that protect the other people in the story? How?
  4. Have you ever held back from writing something because you were worried about hurting someone? What would it mean to write it anyway — carefully and with compassion?
  5. What do you owe the people you write about? What do you owe yourself?

Homework

Write one page in which you tell a true story about another person. Then add one sentence — set apart, at the end — that acknowledges what you do not and cannot know about that person’s experience.


‹ Close

Session 12 — The Body & the Senses: The Physical Life of Memoir

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Memory is stored in the body before it is stored in the mind. A smell, a texture, the quality of light in a room are often the truest access points to the past — more reliable doorways than abstract recollection.
  2. Many beginning writers work “from the neck up.” They tell us what they thought and concluded while the body disappears. Reclaiming physical experience is one of the fastest ways to make prose come alive.
  3. The senses are a form of knowing, not decoration. Sensory detail functions as epistemology: it is how the writer and reader come to understand, not merely ornament laid over meaning that exists elsewhere.
  4. Physical description can be the meaning. Against the assumption that ideas and emotions are the “real” content, strong memoir shows that the rendered body can carry the full weight of significance.
  5. The changing body marks the changing self. Writing the body at different ages reveals who you were at each stage; the physical archive records a life as faithfully as any chronology of events.

Reading

Critical Reception

  • Eight Variations on the Idea of a SentenceBrevity Magazine craft essay — on Doyle’s physical, breath-driven prose and sensory immediacy.
  • On Brian Doyle’s Mystical, Genre-Exploding WorkLiterary Hub — places Doyle’s bodily attention within his larger sense of wonder.
  • Brevity essays by mode and topicBrevity Magazine index — a freely browsable archive rich in essays built on sensory detail and the body.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write about a memory using only one sense — not sight. Choose smell, sound, touch, or taste. Do not name the emotion the memory carries. Let the single sense do all the work.

Discussion Questions

  1. Pick any passage from today’s readings that uses sensory detail with particular power. Read it aloud to yourself. What sense does it engage? How does that sense make the meaning?
  2. What sense do you trust most in your own writing? Which do you neglect?
  3. Is there a smell, a texture, a sound that takes you immediately to a specific memory? What is it? Where does it take you?
  4. We sometimes say that physical descriptions are superficial — that the important things are the ideas and emotions. Do you believe that? Can physical description be the meaning, not just the container for it?
  5. The body changes over a life. How might writing about your body at different ages reveal something about who you were at each stage?

Homework

Write one page in which the body is the primary narrator. Do not describe thoughts or feelings directly. Render everything through physical experience: what the hands did, what the stomach felt, what the skin knew.


‹ Close

Session 13 — Structure I: Chronological and Lyric

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Structure is itself a form of meaning. The shape of a piece is not a neutral container; it makes an argument about the experience being described. Choosing a structure is choosing how the reader will understand the material.
  2. The chronological structure is not “simple.” A well-made chronological memoir makes us feel the inexorability of time — the way events accumulate toward a meaning visible only in retrospect, with the satisfactions of sequence, cause, and arrival.
  3. The lyric essay is not “formless.” Its apparent freedom is actually discipline: it moves by image and association, borrowing from poetry, and every leap must be earnable, every image must carry weight.
  4. Folded time can coexist with chronology. White’s lake essay is chronological in one sense yet holds past and present simultaneously; a writer can honor sequence while letting two times occupy the same moment.
  5. Irresolution can be honesty, not failure. A lyric essay that refuses to resolve may feel truer to certain experiences than a tidy conclusion; the unresolved ending is sometimes the most accurate one.

Reading

  • E. B. White, “Once More to the Lake” (revisited) — freely available — consider now as a structural object: how does White organize time?
  • A lyric essay from Brevity Magazine — search the Essays by Mode index and filter for “lyric essay”; multiple freely available examples

Critical Reception

  • Consider the Platypus: Four Forms—Maybe—of the Lyric EssayBrevity Magazine craft essay — a clear taxonomy of lyric and segmented structures and how they make meaning.
  • Tell It Even More SlantCreative Nonfiction — Brenda Miller on teaching lyric forms and corralling fragments into coherence.
  • Brevity Essays by Mode indexBrevity Magazine — a freely filterable archive of lyric and chronological short essays for structural study.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write about a memory chronologically: beginning, middle, end. Then, on a second sheet of paper, write about the same memory lyrically: not beginning to end, but image to image, association to association. Which version feels truer?

Discussion Questions

  1. White’s essay is chronological in one sense — a single visit to the lake — but it is also folded: the past and the present exist simultaneously. How does he manage time without losing the reader?
  2. What is the effect of a lyric essay that does not resolve? Does it feel incomplete, or does the lack of resolution feel honest?
  3. Think about a story you want to tell. Does it want to go forward in time, or does it want to circle something? How do you know?
  4. What is the relationship between a piece’s structure and the experience it’s describing? Can a chaotic experience be best described by a chronological structure? Can a quiet experience require a fragmented one?
  5. What structures do you encounter in your daily life — in music, in film, in television, in conversation — that feel like essays?

Homework

Write one page using a structure that surprises you. If you tend toward chronological, try lyric. If you tend toward lyric, try a strict sequence. Notice what the unfamiliar structure forces you to see.


‹ Close

Session 14 — Structure II: Braided and Fragmented

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. The braided essay weaves separate threads into one piece. Two or more narrative strands, apparently unrelated, recur and intersect; the revelation comes in the hidden connection between them. As Brevity’s rule of thumb has it, three strands is the natural number — more is hard, fewer is harder.
  2. The fragmented essay trusts white space. Proceeding in numbered or unnumbered sections, it asks the reader to make meaning out of the gaps, refusing to spell out the connective tissue between parts.
  3. Both forms enact connection rather than explain it. They refuse to announce the link between threads; they perform it, requiring the reader to participate in producing the meaning.
  4. These forms suit experiences that resist linear narrative. Lives that contain simultaneous rather than sequential truths — grief layered over routine, catastrophe beside the mundane — often find their truest shape in braiding or fragmentation.
  5. Form can become content. Moore’s alphabetized dictionary structure shows that an unusual organizing principle is not a gimmick but a statement: the form itself says something the linear telling could not.

Reading

  • Jo Ann Beard, “The Fourth State of Matter” (from The Boys of My Youth, 1998) — one of the most celebrated braided essays in American nonfiction; free borrow via Internet Archive
  • Brenda Miller, excerpt from “A Braided Heart: Shaping the Lyric Essay” (from Tell It Slant, ed. Miller and Paola) — search Internet Archive for a free borrow; also discussed at The Brevity Blog
  • Dinty W. Moore, “Son of Mr. Green Jeans” — a fragmented essay built entirely of dictionary definitions; search Brevity Magazine archive for free access

Critical Reception

  • The Fourth State of Matter analysis — SuperSummary — on how Beard delays the central action by braiding four threads: dog, marriage, squirrels, and shooting.
  • Consider the Platypus: Four Forms—Maybe—of the Lyric EssayBrevity Magazine craft essay — Brenda Miller’s own taxonomy of the braided and segmented essay.
  • Son of Mr. Green Jeans: A Collage Without CollageThe PVA Creative Writing Review — a student-critic reading of how Moore’s alphabetical form creates emergent meaning.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Write two brief paragraphs about two completely different memories — two things that, on the surface, have nothing to do with each other. Set them on the page without transition. Then write one sentence — entirely separate — that is the secret connection between them.

Discussion Questions

  1. In Beard’s essay, the story of her dying cat and the story of a mass shooting at her workplace are woven together without explicit connection. Why does that work? What would be lost if she told each story separately?
  2. Miller describes the braided essay as moving by “leap and resonance.” What does resonance mean in this context? Can you feel it when you read it?
  3. Moore’s fragmented essay uses an unusual form — dictionary definitions — as its organizing principle. What does form say about content here? Why definitions?
  4. Think about two memories or subjects that seem completely unrelated. Is there a secret connection between them? What is it?
  5. When does a fragmented structure feel like evasion, and when does it feel like honesty?

Homework

Write one page using a braided or fragmented structure. You might weave two time periods, or return to the same image three times as a refrain, or use numbered sections. Let the form discover something the content alone cannot say.


‹ Close

Session 15 — Revision Workshop: Re-Seeing Your Own Work

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. Revision means re-seeing, not polishing. It is returning to a piece with fresh eyes to ask what it is really about, what is working, what is missing — a far larger act than fixing typos or smoothing sentences.
  2. Structural revision comes before sentence-level editing. The first questions are whether the piece knows what it is, starts in the right place, and ends where it should. Line edits are the last stage, not the first.
  3. Cut what does not serve the discovered truth. A passage kept because you worked hard on it, rather than because it earns its place, is the surest candidate for the knife. The cut is precision, not loss.
  4. A draft often turns out to be about something other than its intention. The writer’s job in revision is to find what the piece actually became — not what it was meant to be — and to follow that.
  5. Earlier work teaches you what you now see. Rereading something written weeks ago reveals how your eye has changed; the gap between then and now is itself evidence of growth as a writer.

Reading

  • Bernard Cooper, “The Fine Art of Sighing” (a brief, structurally elegant personal essay) — search Brevity Magazine or widely available anthologies; recommend as a model of a tightly revised short essay
  • Mary Karr on revision, from The Art of Memoirfree borrow via Internet Archive; her chapter on revision as re-seeing rather than editing is particularly useful here

Critical Reception

  • Mary Karr, The Art of Memoir No. 1The Paris Review interview — Karr on rewriting, memory’s blanks, and owing the reader a vivid experience.
  • Mary Karr on Reading and The Art of MemoirBroad Street — frames Karr’s view of revision as re-seeing rather than tidying.
  • Tell It Even More SlantCreative Nonfiction — on shaping and re-shaping fragmentary material into coherent meaning.

In-Class Practice

Ten minutes, by hand. Take a paragraph from something you have written in this course. Rewrite it from scratch — not editing the original, but starting over, knowing what you now know. Compare the two versions. What changed?

Discussion Questions

  1. Read something you wrote earlier in this course — even just a single paragraph. What do you notice now that you didn’t notice then? What has changed in how you see it?
  2. Where does your draft start? Is that the right place? What would happen if you cut the first paragraph — or the first page?
  3. Is there a sentence in your draft that you love but that might not be earning its place? What would happen if you cut it?
  4. What is your draft actually about? Not what you intended it to be about — what it turned out to be about. Are those the same thing?
  5. What is one concrete change you could make to this piece that would make it truer?

Homework

Revise one piece of writing from this course — one complete draft, however short. Make at least three structural changes (not just sentence-level edits). Bring it to Session 16 if you would like to read it aloud.


‹ Close

Session 16 — Reading & Celebration

Main Points of the Lesson

  1. This session belongs to you. The final week is a voluntary read-aloud of student work; nothing is required, and choosing to listen is a complete and generous contribution to the room.
  2. A room of listeners is the reason writers write. The act of reading aloud — even a single sentence or paragraph — completes the circuit between writer and audience that the whole course has been building toward.
  3. Reflection consolidates learning. Closing with a conversation about what surprised you, what you learned, and what you will keep writing turns a sixteen-week experience into something portable.
  4. Writing from a life is a practice, not a finish line. The course ends but the work continues; the habits of attention and honesty you have built are meant to outlast these meetings.
  5. Bring what you have made. There is no new reading this week — only the gathering of the writing you have done, in whatever form it has taken.

Reading

  • No new reading this week. Come with whatever you have made — a revised draft, an in-class exercise from any week, a single sentence, a paragraph, anything at all.

Critical Reception

  • How to Own Your Story: Vivian GornickThe Marginalian — a closing reminder that the story is the insight you carry forward, not the events you leave behind.
  • Mary Karr, The Art of Memoir No. 1The Paris Review interview — encouragement for the working writer on persistence and the long life of a story.
  • Brevity Magazinethe ongoing archive — a free, ever-growing home of short creative nonfiction to keep reading and submitting to after the course ends.

In-Class Practice

Five to ten minutes, by hand. Write a single sentence you would be willing to read aloud — the truest line you have written in this course, or a new one composed on the spot. No one is required to share, but have it ready in case you choose to.

Discussion Questions

  1. What is one sentence — from your own writing or from any of our readings — that you will carry with you?
  2. What is one thing about a piece of writing that you now notice that you did not notice before this course?
  3. What story do you still want to tell?
  4. What surprised you about yourself as a writer?
  5. What will you do next?

Homework

Keep writing. Choose one piece you began in this course and commit to finishing a complete draft of it in the month ahead — and find one reader, even just yourself a year from now, to read it honestly.


All the Readings

A note on access: Several texts below are by contemporary authors under copyright. In those cases, free digital borrows are available through the Internet Archive (archive.org) — no library card, subscription, or purchase required. Freely available online sources are linked where possible. Brevity Magazine publishes hundreds of short creative nonfiction essays for free on its website and is an extraordinary ongoing resource for this entire genre.

Session Author Title Access
1 Joan Didion “On Keeping a Notebook” Internet Archive — Slouching Towards Bethlehem
1 Annie Dillard “To Fashion a Text” Search Internet Archive — Inventing the Truth; instructor distributes excerpt
2 Michel de Montaigne “Of Experience” or “To Philosophize Is to Learn to Die” (excerpt) Public domain — Project Gutenberg
2 Annie Dillard “Living Like Weasels” DailyGood — full text free
3 E. B. White “Once More to the Lake” Clary Lake Association — freely available
3 James Baldwin “Notes of a Native Son” (opening) Internet Archive
4 Brian Doyle “The Inexhaustible Quarry of Memory” The American Scholar — freely available
4 Brian Doyle “His Last Game” Notre Dame Magazine
5 Phillip Lopate “The Essay Lives in the First Person” Internet Archive — The Art of the Personal Essay
5 David Sedaris “Jesus Shaves” Search Internet Archive; instructor distributes
6 Audre Lorde “The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action” Iowa State AWPC
6 Vivian Gornick The Situation and the Story (excerpt on persona) Internet Archive; key passage at The Marginalian
7 Mary Oliver “Of Power and Time” The Marginalian — free
7 TBD Philadelphia essay Various Brevity Magazine topic index — freely browsable
8 Brian Doyle “The Inexhaustible Quarry of Memory” (revisited) The American Scholar — freely available
8 Vivian Gornick The Situation and the Story (excerpt on memory and truth) Internet Archive; The Marginalian
9 Maxine Hong Kingston “No Name Woman” Internet Archive — The Woman Warrior
9 Brian Doyle “The Hills and Dales of Their Father” The American Scholar — freely available
10 Maxine Hong Kingston Second excerpt, The Woman Warrior Internet Archive
10 Various Essays on family and inheritance Brevity Magazine — search the archive freely
11 Mary Karr The Art of Memoir (ethics chapter) Internet Archive; key principles at Bookmarker
11 Vivian Gornick The Situation and the Story (excerpt on writing others) Internet Archive
12 Various Essays on body and sensory detail Brevity — body tag; sensory detail tag — freely available
12 Brian Doyle “Moist All Over” The American Scholar — freely available
13 E. B. White “Once More to the Lake” (revisited as structural model) Freely available
13 Various Lyric essays Brevity Essays by Mode index — filter for lyric essay
14 Jo Ann Beard “The Fourth State of Matter” Internet Archive — The Boys of My Youth
14 Brenda Miller “A Braided Heart” Search Internet Archive — Tell It Slant; discussed at The Brevity Blog
14 Dinty W. Moore “Son of Mr. Green Jeans” Brevity Magazine — search archive
15 Bernard Cooper “The Fine Art of Sighing” Search Brevity Magazine or widely available anthologies
15 Mary Karr The Art of Memoir (revision chapter) Internet Archive

Open the Whiteboard →

‹ Back to the 2601 Salon